NEC PC-MK33LLZDF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNEC PC-MK33LLZDF  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-7770ML
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 15:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$79
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 115
58% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 189
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Device(1BCF A042) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0618B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 25 32 55 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 422
Write 376
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 61.5
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 19.3
49% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 1.1
66% 152 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback