Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '15 at 06:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8310
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 129
45% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 394
37% 307 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 52% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1014.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 59
Parallax 79.8
56% 69.3 fps
MRender 55.5
Gravity 62
Splatting 75.3
54% 64.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 410
Write 22.1
Mixed 24.2
32% 152 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 2.94
48% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 41.4
DQ Mixed 2.7
10% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 75%
Asrock RAM Disk 1GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
567GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 157
Mixed 155
135% 181 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.31
104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback