Lenovo 20DH000WGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20DH000WGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20DH000WGE
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7100 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 71.2
32% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 104
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5110) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 6.87
4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 286 254 245 229 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 237
Write 226
Mixed 282
SusWrite 251
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 28.5
97% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 152
112% 147 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 11
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.2
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback