Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '20 at 21:04
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 94.4 46% 71.4 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 161 24% 174 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 58.8 56% 64.8 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 65.4 Splatting 68.7 56% 67.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20 12,702 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 60 58 59 60 61 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.6% Below average	Read 221 Write 188 Mixed 188 SusWrite 58.6 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 18 81% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 0.5 13% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 295GB free Firmware: JP2OA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 101 102 101 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 93.3 Mixed 40 SusWrite 101 61% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 74%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 25GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 61 60 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 63.8 Mixed 46 SusWrite 60.3 42% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA790X-UD4P Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	3x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	2x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	12x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	2x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $444

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16