Fujitsu CELSIUS W480

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W480  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2917-A1
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100429
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 398
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 3.91
7% 6.96 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 5.26
5% 6.59 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 173 168 174 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 222
Write 217
Mixed 196
SusWrite 169
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 20
71% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 184
138% 182 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
225GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 186 184 183 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 241
Write 233
Mixed 222
SusWrite 185
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 26.6
90% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
233GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 120 120 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 124
Write 113
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 120
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
H/W RAID 1 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: 0106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 118 117 121 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 100
Write 128
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 118
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
6GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.2 5 4.8 4.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 85.8
Write 3.3
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5
20% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 0198 99U5474-028.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W480 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback