HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8459
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190502
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '20 at 17:16
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 68.3 2-Core 104 48% 78.6 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 93.5 14% 99.1 Pts	64-Core 97.4 6% 97.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8459) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.16.03 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.38% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 6.77 Parallax 5.66 3% 5.51 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 4.57 3% 4.16 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.38% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 208 229 239 240 247 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 351 Write 312 Mixed 343 SusWrite 230 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 42.5 136% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 236 173% 228 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 197%
SMI USB DISK 64GB 1,634 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 5GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.5 10 8.1 4.8 29 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 82.7 Write 23.8 Mixed 63 SusWrite 10.4 53% 45 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2.2 142% 3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 40%
Maxell HDD 500GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 19GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 33 33 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 32 Write 31.5 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 32.2 40% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB 19,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.7% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.1 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx

CPU
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	31x
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	30x
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	26x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	31x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	30x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	26x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	13x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	10x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBSK_HynixBench 20%, 117 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16