Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '20 at 15:45
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 95 2-Core 209 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 819 74% 622 Pts	64-Core 1053 65% 1053 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 134 Parallax 148 110% 139 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 120 Splatting 103 101% 127 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 91GB free Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 777 823 183 209 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	156% Outstanding	Read 1,265 Write 1212 Mixed 1,163 SusWrite 524 234% 1,041 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 54.4 174% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 493 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 455 332% 435 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 276%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 180,890 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 456GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1498 826 626 549 585 542 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1,568 Write 1761 Mixed 1264 SusWrite 771 301% 1,341 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 57.1 183% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 499 DQ Write 367 DQ Mixed 471 342% 446 MB/s
Poor: 164% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 315GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 398 448 457 460 462 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 474 Mixed 400 SusWrite 434 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 44.8 149% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 184 180% 285 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 134%
WD WD740GD-00FLA2 74GB 1,363 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 55GB free Firmware: 33.08F33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 67 67 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 67.2 Write 71 Mixed 38 SusWrite 66.9 44% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 39%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 131 136 134 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 137 Write 48 Mixed 69 SusWrite 134 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 75%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 65GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 148 149 150 150 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 156 Write 138 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 149 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.6 331% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 111%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 67GB free Firmware: JF100-14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 63 63 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 65.2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 63.4 43% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 31.4 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 24.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,947x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	435x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	403x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	285x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	247x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	284x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	226x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	278x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)