| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B84 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190130 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 04 '20 at 09:49 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.7%
Very good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
49% 360 Pts
|
26% 421 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.7%
Above average
|
52% 61.2 fps
|
54% 66.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 276 511 382 681 230 MB/s
|
192%
Outstanding
|
266% 1,192 MB/s
|
207% 79.4 MB/s
|
244% 565 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
32GB free
Firmware: ZH100-47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 32 54 54 55 54 MB/s
|
26%
Poor
|
27% 35.9 MB/s
|
145% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
48.1%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
47% 84.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 574 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 121x |
| Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-CoreAMDBench 71%, 10,689 samples | 75x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 89x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $255 |