Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 21:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 840
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 113
Parallax 94.5
86% 105 fps
MRender 84
Gravity 103
Splatting 85.5
74% 90.7 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 307 301 298 291 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 320
Mixed 276
SusWrite 297
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 27.2
144% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 243
199% 281 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 141 145 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 141
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
28GB free, PID 121f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 12.5
19% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.2
125% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVRB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVRB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 30.7
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,016
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback