Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA720
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 16:22
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 110
48% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 374
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 103
Parallax 89.1
79% 96.1 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 73.8
72% 90 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 400 401 404 400 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,800
Write 1,369
Mixed 767
SusWrite 401
240% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 37.1
160% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 467
354% 477 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 166%
Great: 302%
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: STES1024 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1602 917 746 697 792 857 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 1,164
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 935
247% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 27
91% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 533
DQ Mixed 736
529% 686 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 158%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback