Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 821 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	26% Poor	Memory 37.4 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 43.4 22% 34.2 Pts	4-Core 85.5 8-Core 85.9 11% 85.7 Pts	64-Core 85.2 5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BDD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4308 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.5% Terrible	Lighting 1.43 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2 1% 1.98 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.5% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung CGND3R 63GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 156 Write 102 Mixed 124 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 5.11 41% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.5 DQ Write 34.8 DQ Mixed 5.06 10% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.02% Terrible	Read 21.4 Write 8.64 Mixed 5.73 12% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.005 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.02% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1600, 1600 MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16