Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 244 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 634 63% 514 Pts	64-Core 687 42% 687 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.3% Poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 100 Parallax 87.4 0% 62.5 fps	MRender 87.3 Gravity 84.5 Splatting 89 71% 86.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 396GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 402 421 408 417 403 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 416 Mixed 387 SusWrite 411 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 32.5 150% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 49.9 100% 199 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 707GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 134 117 132 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 27.3 Write 185 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 130 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.4% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 20.4 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 20.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	717x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	478x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	304x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	452x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	390x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	126x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16