Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F3
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 23:23
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 166 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 253 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	4.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 8.08 Parallax 6.62 5% 6.93 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 6.03 Splatting 0.09 3% 4.82 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 73 73 66 65 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 464 Write 331 Mixed 337 SusWrite 97.2 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 28.5 123% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 177 159% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 208GB free Firmware: JEDOA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 58 58 57 58 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 66 Write 68.5 Mixed 38 SusWrite 57 42% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GB 976 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	186x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	82x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	48x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	262x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	84x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	39x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	14x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	72x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16