Apple MacBookPro11,4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro11,4  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-06F11FD93F0323C5
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 189
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 502
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Apple(106B 0147) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 8.62
Parallax 13.2
6% 9.87 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 16.2
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 954
Write 1,212
Mixed 632
208% 933 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 28.2
79% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 516
382% 511 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453120 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 20.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,4 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback