Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 173 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 360 42% 326 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 555 604 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Apple(106B 017A) 2GB CLim: 855 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 22.2 14% 20 fps	MRender 19.8 Gravity 15.7 Splatting 23.7 17% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 360 382 317 409 397 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 361 Write 340 Mixed 248 SusWrite 366 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 13.5 43% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 66.8 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 102 77% 100 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.1% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

RAM
0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,090 samples	105x
0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GBUnknownBench 71%, 707 samples	58x
0x483943434E4E4E434C47414C41522D4E5644 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 170 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16