Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 06:06
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 810
85% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,049
65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 62.7
56% 66.6 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 53.8
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,105
Write 2,114
Mixed 1,403
417% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 51.2
185% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 680
517% 710 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 390%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
514GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 424 425 28 6.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 497
Write 419
Mixed 400
SusWrite 220
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 29.7
135% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 40.4
71% 139 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
38GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 303 307 224 297 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 424
Mixed 364
SusWrite 287
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 42.6
148% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 175
139% 195 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 113%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
73GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 156 154 154 157 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 447
Write 210
Mixed 236
SusWrite 150
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 39.5
139% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 165
120% 154 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 85%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
284GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 119 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 65
SusWrite 118
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
127GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 98.9
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 43.2
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 40.7
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback