Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 149% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 163% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 01:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Memory 86.6 1-Core 154 2-Core 308 99% 183 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 1,016 98% 806 Pts	64-Core 2,151 133% 2,151 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37BD) CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	153% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 210 Parallax 213 172% 212 fps	MRender 250 Gravity 205 Splatting 132 153% 196 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 375GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2100 2145 2158 2188 2198 2246 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	383% Outstanding	Read 2612 Write 2,121 Mixed 1,474 SusWrite 2,172 470% 2,095 MB/s	4K Read 57.8 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 83.5 295% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,347 DQ Write 1,116 DQ Mixed 1,242 928% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 383% Great: 425%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB 3,351 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 58GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.8 7.8 5.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Read 20 Write 1.7 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.9 10% 8.85 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.7% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 22.2 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 24.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,160x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	869x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	868x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	608x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	311x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	212x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,807

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16