PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100916 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 01 '20 at 21:33 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 860-$339
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
68.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 82 95 41 26 33 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba A100 240GB
9GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 94 92 36 27 45 MB/s
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
171GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 88 83 89 94 92 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
BUFFALO External HDD 640GB
545GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
409GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 90 92 91 89 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
18GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 66x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 48x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $528 |