Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 298
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 754
79% 633 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.9
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 1294 831 835 835 836 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,651
Write 1,858
Mixed 1,726
SusWrite 1,005
403% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 70
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 98
326% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1458
DQ Write 1,336
DQ Mixed 1,380
1,040% 1,391 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 331%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
112GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 466
Write 132
Mixed 136
SusWrite 129
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 21.1
118% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 45.5
62% 118 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
107GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 93.3
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 88.7
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 40.7
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 39.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback