HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 20:00
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 290
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 965
91% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
HP(103C 8550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 205
Parallax 200
154% 198 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 188
Splatting 131
144% 183 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 141%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 795 777 797 799 795 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,834
Write 1,514
Mixed 1,420
SusWrite 881
316% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 61.5
206% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 933
725% 996 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 237%
Great: 247%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
608GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1457 1492 1465 1443 1444 1478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2162
Write 1,466
Mixed 1214
SusWrite 1,463
352% 1,576 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 78.5
252% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 1,206
843% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 299%
Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 156 163 168 167 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 165
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 163
93% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
477GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 130 132 133 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 125
Write 75.2
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 132
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 126
Write 26.8
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 26.9
65% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3
217% 4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 26.1
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $876
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback