PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock H67M-GE (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120427 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 01 '20 at 19:20 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
47.7%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Colorful SL300 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 85 71 64 46 46 MB/s
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
66%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DBLT4GN568S 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 14x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 12x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 6x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $579 |