| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | HP 2000 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3577 |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111218 |
| Uptime | 17.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 01 '20 at 19:18 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 64% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD E-450 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
|
39.7%
Below average
|
31% 38.1 Pts
|
4% 29 Pts
|
2% 34.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.1.2000
|
0.53%
Terrible
|
0% 0.76 fps
|
1% 0.79 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 43 42 38 51 43 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
37% 50.2 MB/s
|
87% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.7%
Very poor
|
10% 3.37 GB/s
|
5% 1.6 GB/s
|
44% 90.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 2000 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 126x |
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 83x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 206x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 91x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |