Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '20 at 00:27
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 188 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 688 61% 519 Pts	64-Core 889 55% 889 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 3416) CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Lighting 65.1 Reflection 65 Parallax 77.8 53% 69.3 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 62.3 Splatting 54.4 49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SE20G-256 256GB 1,193 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 259 271 253 261 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Read 659 Write 510 Mixed 546 SusWrite 267 111% 496 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 29.1 115% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 501 DQ Write 418 DQ Mixed 273 256% 397 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 209%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 336GB free Firmware: AM0B1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 108 109 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 108 65% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0- M393B1G70BH0- M393B1G70QH0- M393B1G70BH0- 32GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 28.5 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	109x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	43x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	38x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	257x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	92x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16