HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A64h
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 23:14
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ 4,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 32.1 2-Core 54.5 32% 47.8 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 55.6 8% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 47.9 3% 47.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Device(0000 0000) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.27 0% 0.27 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 103 107 107 114 118 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.3% Poor	Read 152 Write 79.6 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 111 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 10.6 42% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 10.3 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 12.8 10% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 465GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 124 123 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 126 Write 129 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 121 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 806GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 23.1 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 21.1 30% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 41GB 2,583 User benchmarks, average bench 17% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.1 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc5750 Microtower Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	2x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+AMD $50Bench 34%, 2,970 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	1x
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 120GBSamsung $35Bench 93%, 20,420 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	1x

RAM
37GBUnknownBench 15%, 3,950 samples	4x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	3x
38GBUnknownBench 16%, 3,056 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16