Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131206
Uptime	11.3 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 22:06
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 185 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 335 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit) 10,656 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8477) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 31.4 20% 27.2 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 23.6 23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 203 20 58 20 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 483 Write 419 Mixed 12.6 SusWrite 85.2 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 30.6 93% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 0.4 78% 186 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 153 152 149 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 139 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 150 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 107%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 67GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 60GB free, PID 0153 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	5.78% Terrible	Read 16.4 Write 12.8 Mixed 2 SusWrite 11.4 13% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GB 1,512 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 17.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 20.3 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	211x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	92x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	36x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16