Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q665 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB28F
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y71 3,052 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 150 58% 101 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 135 25% 174 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fujitsu(10CF 189A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 3.03 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-00000 256GB 803 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT2106Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 214 245 250 250 250 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 375 Write 255 Mixed 178 SusWrite 233 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 17 66% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 69.9 107% 204 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 15.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	4x
Core M-5Y10cIntelBench 44%, 3,050 samples	2x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	6x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	2x
MZNTE256HMHP-00007 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 25 samples	2x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16