Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 19:21
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	NAM-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 79.5 1-Core 152 2-Core 297 95% 176 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 1,030 96% 797 Pts	64-Core 1,444 89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Lighting 78.9 Reflection 79.4 Parallax 68 64% 75.4 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 72.7 Splatting 74 60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9,039 Write 4744 Mixed 5,958 1,452% 6,580 MB/s	4K Read 565 4K Write 256 4K Mixed 300 1,376% 374 MB/s	DQ Read 1,579 DQ Write 1,218 DQ Mixed 1,260 980% 1,352 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 85GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 78 78 78 77 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 76 Write 77.3 Mixed 52 SusWrite 77.1 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 474GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 91 93 93 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 82 Mixed 55 SusWrite 92.2 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 1x8GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,135x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,715x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	912x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	697x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,493

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16