Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 542
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 47.9
51% 54.8 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 50
40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 53 59 71 98 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 473
Write 71
Mixed 108
SusWrite 70.8
39% 181 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 22.2
81% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 45.1
46% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 59%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
83GB free
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 29 63 59 79 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 444
Write 262
Mixed 185
SusWrite 89.5
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 19
78% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 16.7
36% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.8 4.9 5.1 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.8
17% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G4D26AFTA.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback