Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200407
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 09:24
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 83.5 1-Core 149 2-Core 281 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 1,002 95% 789 Pts	64-Core 1,312 81% 1,312 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8687) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 50.8 44% 55.9 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 54.2 Splatting 70.7 55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB 15,624 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 835GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 1448 1473 1493 1472 1488 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	293% Outstanding	Read 2,020 Write 2,287 Mixed 1798 SusWrite 1,531 430% 1,909 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 73.6 258% 99.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,012 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 904 669% 888 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 293% Great: 334%
WDC WD6003FZBX-00GXAB0 6TB 480 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 234 241 227 240 228 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 212 Write 208 Mixed 99 SusWrite 234 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 1.3 9% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 3.9 DQ Write 4.8 DQ Mixed 6.7 4% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 27%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 227 233 226 234 228 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 895GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 112 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 111 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 84%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 120GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 68 70 65 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 105 Write 94.7 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 67.9 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 605GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 63.5 Write 61.5 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 105 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 845GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 118 117 122 124 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 183 Write 163 Mixed 108 SusWrite 122 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 108%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 120GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 62 63 62 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3734 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 39.6 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 34.9 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 171%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 195%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	45x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	41x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	35x

GPU
RX 6900-XTAMD $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples	18x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	17x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,280Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	17x

SSD
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	13x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	11x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 103%, 778 samples	9x
4000 C19 Series 4x8GBUnknownBench 109%, 1,748 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $1,495

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16