Sony SVE15115ENW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSony SVE15115ENW  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 08:19
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 63
2-Core 107
54% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 154
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
Sony(104D 90AC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 3.47
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 3.04
2% 3.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 69 84 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 76
Write 70
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 81.7
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19N Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback