Asrock H370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 271
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 762
80% 643 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Zotac(19DA 3543) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 84.4
Parallax 74.9
77% 84.8 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 77.1
62% 75.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 254 239 226 209 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 466
Write 270
Mixed 250
SusWrite 230
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 32.2
106% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 179
173% 275 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 128%
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$35
148GB free
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 589 422 424 426 421 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 1,202
Mixed 994
SusWrite 451
209% 930 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 54.7
189% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 718
559% 768 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 164%
Great: 193%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
24GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 85 84 82 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 74.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 82.4
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
525GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.7
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 75.2
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51%
Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 156 155 160 160 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 172
Write 152
Mixed 90
SusWrite 160
190% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback