ECS H77H2-EM

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H77H2-EM (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 30 '20 at 17:16
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 176 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 325 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 2111) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: 411040WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 262 261 262 263 266 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 436 Write 287 Mixed 237 SusWrite 266 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 34.9 115% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 251 210% 307 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 111%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33 2,259 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 17GB free Firmware: PF2OA6BA SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 36 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 38 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 36.3 26% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 32%
Samsung HN-M320MBB 320GB 730 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 172GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 61.8 Write 2.7 Mixed 29 SusWrite 62.9 29% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4GB DDR3 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.3% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.6 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H77H2-EM

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	46x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	19x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	14x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	18x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x

RAM
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 50%, 1,084 samples	10x
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 1,021 samples	9x
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 4x4GBRamaxelBench 54%, 292 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16