Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 16:50
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 87.9
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 87
54% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 246
23% 190 Pts
64-Core 250
15% 250 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 36
22% 31.3 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 24
Splatting 32.6
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 18 17 17 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 489
Write 34.5
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 20.4
32% 151 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.7
43% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
737GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 169 154 174 187 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 152
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 173
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
ADATA HM900 3TB
1.5TB free, PID a43a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 69 84 86 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 155
Write 151
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 83.2
153% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 70%
HGST HTS 541075A9E680 750GB
193GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 27 34 35 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 33.1
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 33.6
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
138GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 44 55 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 45.4
Mixed 33
SusWrite 54.3
63% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback