Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 16:38
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 794
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1615 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 65.4
60% 70.9 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 59.3
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1606 1479 1451 1463 1457 1426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,335
Write 2,110
Mixed 1,729
SusWrite 1,480
430% 1,914 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 72
234% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 828
601% 785 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 291%
Great: 410%
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
78GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 55 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 410
Write 375
Mixed 269
SusWrite 88.8
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 21.8
109% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 133
134% 210 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
324GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 69
Write 69.7
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 72.2
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
11GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 65 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 80
Write 73.7
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 65.2
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 23.4
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback