Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 16:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,089
98% 827 Pts
64-Core 2,130
132% 2,130 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 430 440 444 443 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 483
Write 441
Mixed 307
SusWrite 440
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 27.2
94% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 67.2
81% 141 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 111%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
378GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 458 458 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 450
Mixed 433
SusWrite 458
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 59.8
195% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 150
113% 151 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
741GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 151 152 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 134
Write 124
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 150
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 41.4
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 37.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback