Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 13:28
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 340
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.72% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 9.19
9% 11 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 14.9
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.72%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 310 311 311 312 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 452
Mixed 400
SusWrite 321
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 43.8
137% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 111%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
539GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 140 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 106
Write 21.8
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 140
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST380215A 80GB-$50
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 31 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 75
Write 11.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 31.5
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 4GB
1GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 4.5 4.1 4.8 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 2.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.4
5% 3.93 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback