Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 155 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 371 39% 311 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 2114) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 1.94 3% 3.38 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 4 Splatting 0.09 2% 3.24 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 79 67 68 67 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 410 Write 335 Mixed 292 SusWrite 109 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 12.4 43% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 86.9 DQ Mixed 41.2 47% 82 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	61x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	44x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	13x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 38%, 426 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	14x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 40%, 239 samples	6x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16