| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161011 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 30 '20 at 12:26 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
84% 147 Pts
|
65% 521 Pts
|
40% 638 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
56% 49.8 fps
|
40% 46.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 233 79 297 33 386 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
28% 128 MB/s
|
44% 12.9 MB/s
|
8% 11 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
437GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 147 148 148 149 MB/s
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
86% 120 MB/s
|
124% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston ASU21D4U5S8MB-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
38.9%
Below average
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
64% 63 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 680x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 539x |
| Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 206x |
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 105x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $107 |