Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120820
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 01:10
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 179
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 345
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 35.2
29% 33.1 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 34.6
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 121 133 134 135 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 364
Write 348
Mixed 271
SusWrite 123
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 29.6
100% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 41.2
39% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 101%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 125 134 135 135 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 201
Mixed 106
SusWrite 125
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
385% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 118%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 119 123 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 132
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 118
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
250% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
2TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 119 123 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 167
Write 166
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 118
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
313% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback