Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101019
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 29 '20 at 19:54
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 78.2 2-Core 148 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 349 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 314 20% 314 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 5700 323 User benchmarks, average bench 93% Asus(1043 0583) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72% Very good	Lighting 75.4 Reflection 91.2 Parallax 173 61% 113 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 104 Splatting 132 92% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 79 103 33 34 60 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.3% Below average	Read 228 Write 210 Mixed 188 SusWrite 60.8 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 10.6 37% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 148 120% 170 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 87%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 127GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 124 125 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 168 Write 168 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 125 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.7 339% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 44GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.5% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16