| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Clevo W250EGQ / W270EGQ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | CLEVO W250EGQ / W270EGQ |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120903 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 29 '20 at 18:17 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.6%
Good
|
66% 110 Pts
|
36% 285 Pts
|
20% 316 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 2707) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
3.4%
Terrible
|
3% 4.45 fps
|
4% 4.57 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 436 436 428 390 382 MB/s
|
97.9%
Outstanding
|
95% 421 MB/s
|
125% 44.7 MB/s
|
230% 333 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
75GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 130 128 128 128 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
78% 27.8 MB/s
|
66% 125 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.6%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
56% 71.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical W250EGQ / W270EGQ Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Clevo W250EGQ / W270EGQ
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 1x |
| Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $135 |