Biostar IH61MF-Q5

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar IH61MF-Q5 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 29 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 117 55% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 231 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 110F) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 55 1.3 25 103 52 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.4% Poor	Read 212 Write 156 Mixed 111 SusWrite 65.1 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 8.6 47% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 26.7 DQ Mixed 9.5 11% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 53%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 466GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 123 123 122 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 116 Write 106 Mixed 69 SusWrite 122 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 466GB free Firmware: JE3AD70F SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 85.7 Write 20.5 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 23.5 28% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8N0QNSCG 830B NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 4GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11.6 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical IH61MF-Q5 Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar IH61MF-Q5

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	38x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	18x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	25x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	16x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x

SSD
SA400S37/120GB 120GBKingstonBench 55%, 363 samples	15x
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 72%, 4,923 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 3,862 samples	11x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	8x
99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 987 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16