Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 157 72% 117 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 407 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.51% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 2.41 1% 7.11 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.51% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 74 111 53 42 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 345 Write 202 Mixed 136 SusWrite 72.1 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 20.2 67% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 27.6 DQ Mixed 21.5 17% 23 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB 1,153 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 15.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,781x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	627x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	404x

SSD
MZ7TE512HMHP-000 512GBSamsungBench 75%, 3,033 samples	136x
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 69%, 2,145 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	102x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	416x
RMT3160ME68FAF1600 2x8GBRamaxelBench 52%, 3,672 samples	236x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	219x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16