| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-F (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141125 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 29 '20 at 14:13 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.9%
Very good
|
74% 126 Pts
|
44% 336 Pts
|
22% 362 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.9%
Average
|
44% 49.2 fps
|
38% 45.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 233 242 233 234 235 MB/s
|
66.9%
Good
|
54% 241 MB/s
|
106% 34.6 MB/s
|
143% 197 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
166GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 71 72 71 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
62% 83.8 MB/s
|
138% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 143 154 161 144 MB/s
|
71.6%
Very good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
51% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 04EF Team-Elite-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
49.1%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
61% 65.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 167 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 20x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 31x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |