| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Foxconn H61MXE/-S/-V/-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130201 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | May 29 '20 at 14:13 |
| Run Duration | 201 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
66% 113 Pts
|
37% 284 Pts
|
15% 247 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
25% 51.3 fps
|
41% 50.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 27 8.8 18 12 40 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
34% 45.7 MB/s
|
123% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 22 20 22 23 21 MB/s
|
23.3%
Poor
|
25% 33.7 MB/s
|
76% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
0% 0.5 MB/s
|
0% 0 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73QH0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
25.4%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
52% 76.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61MXE/-S/-V/-K Builds (Compare 234 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXE/-S/-V/-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 27x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 23x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 18x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 41x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 21x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |