ARLT Quattro Power Station GTX 650 Ti

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	ARLT Quattro Power Station GTX 650 Ti (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI B75A-G43 (MS-7758)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121023
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 29 '20 at 13:38
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 90.6 1-Core 79 2-Core 124 62% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 123 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 37.6 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 36.1 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dogfish 64GB 64GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0221A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 189 102 94 92 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 482 Write 405 Mixed 390 SusWrite 151 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 27.8 130% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 49.1 96% 188 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 93%
WL1500GSA6454G 1.5TB 391 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.12B.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 122 122 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 121 Write 114 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 121 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.5 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Quattro Power Station GTX 650 Ti Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: ARLT Quattro Power Station GTX 650 Ti

CPU
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	5x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	4x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	3x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	1x

RAM
99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 99U5474-023.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 51%, 3 samples	2x
99U5584-020.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5584-020.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 58%, 5 samples	2x
99U5584-004.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 154 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16