Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '20 at 06:54
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Memory 80.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 720 76% 611 Pts	64-Core 738 46% 738 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.25 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 3.1 56 4.6 21 60 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 416 Write 195 Mixed 274 SusWrite 41.1 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 19.3 61% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 82.4 DQ Mixed 43.5 46% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 135GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 164 173 174 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 166 Mixed 124 SusWrite 173 123% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905701-022.A00G 1x16GB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	480x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	456x
Pentium Gold G5400Intel $55Bench 62%, 15,354 samples	56x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	279x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	113x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	103x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	111x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	61x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	46x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	49x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	28x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16