PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170908 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '20 at 00:31 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 114 117 131 98 69 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
182GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 332 351 348 345 359 MB/s
|
80%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,281x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 950x |
Core i5-7500Intel $88Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 703x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 521x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 465x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 458x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $400 |