PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160722 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '20 at 00:27 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
|
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 442 428 431 431 428 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
459GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 185 184 186 193 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
96GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 15 16 16 16 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
93%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,233x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,033x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 859x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 739x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 374x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |