Gigabyte GA-H310N 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310N 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 28 '20 at 22:49
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 136 2-Core 265 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 520 70% 520 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 128B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.97 4% 4.84 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.22 5% 5.55 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 51 52 75 79 77 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 410 Write 288 Mixed 245 SusWrite 88.7 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 12.5 78% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 86.2 DQ Mixed 29.7 42% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 53%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 101GB free Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 83 80 77 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 396 Write 359 Mixed 330 SusWrite 105 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 20.7 125% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 31.6 80% 164 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 78%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB 325 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 0727 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 12 13 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	6.55% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 9.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 12.3 14% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.55% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FD2 2x8GB 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 28.3 88% 31 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 26.5 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310N 2.0 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310N 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	26x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	17x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	6x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	10x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	6x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	5x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 78%, 1,125 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16